I have however already have a battery-powered XLR preamp, I can connect the camcorder s.meine. Then just 200, - ¬ difference, so what all? Ī similar handle, Panasonic costs 300, - + VATĪn XLR adapter for the XM2 (I myself) that offers much less costs 250, - ¬ bruttoĭo not believe that the additional part under Canon 300, - Euros. So much difference songwriter of a standard to a HG10 standard XA10. However, it is quite possible that it is available at 400 - is 500 Euronen difference. The larger has yet offers all the handles a larger internal memory and a waveform monitor for image optimization or control. One can thus compare very well there and see the few differences between the two models. Have synonymous just saw that slashcam camcorder has both already in the database. The G10 does not seem to be prepared for the handle. There are pictures (looking at himself - I will not link the pages here). I have just searched the net for Officers of the RF-G10. I still have no detailed picture of the RF-G10 seen. The handle is obviously stuck in guides of the camera and bolted s.zwei female. If so, you can help possibly synonymous with a tinkering and so the camera in retrospect a little cheaper for Quasi - rebuild XA10.īut I doubt a bit that the handle is as accessories for the HF-G10, as this would require that the connecting thread and the pieces have-XA10. If the two cameras really totally identical - to be shown on the handle with Audio section? I mean in the first place, the inner values. It could be that this is offered up "Optional accessories" as. Since Canon as you write "not stupid", note that the retrofitting of the G10 for XA10 s.Ende be more expensive than if you were to buy the same XA10. It is quite possible that the G10 is the handle to the retrofit. You write the possible solution that yourself: Canon is not so stupid to be able to cheaper accessories from a "G10" a "XA10" make.
0 kommentar(er)
